Predicting drug concentrations
Predict a future concentration from a measured one, calculate the elimination rate constant from two measured concentrations, or find the time needed to reach a target concentration.
What is this for?
In first-order elimination a constant fraction of drug is removed per unit time, so concentration decays exponentially. Three questions follow from the same relationship: what will the concentration be later, how fast is this patient eliminating the drug, and how long until it is safe to redose.
How to use it
- Choose what you want to find: a future concentration, the elimination rate constant, or the time to a target.
- Fill in the fields that mode requires — the blocked message tells you exactly which are missing.
- You can supply either ke or the half-life; PharmCalc converts between them.
Worked example
A vancomycin concentration is 20 mg/L. The patient's elimination rate constant is 0.1 h⁻¹. What will the concentration be 8 hours later?
Answer: C₂ = 20 × e^(−0.1 × 8) = 20 × 0.449 = 8.99 mg/L. That is 1.15 half-lives, so a little more than half has been eliminated.
Clinical pearls & pitfalls
- The elimination rate constant is a fraction per unit time, not an amount per unit time. A ke of 0.1 h⁻¹ means about 9.5% of what is present is removed each hour — not 10%, because the fraction applies continuously.
- This is the calculation behind deciding when a supratherapeutic level has fallen far enough to redose safely, and it is used routinely in aminoglycoside and vancomycin monitoring.
- The two-concentration method gives the patient's own elimination rate rather than a population estimate, which is why paired levels are drawn. Both samples must be in the elimination phase, after distribution is complete.
- A common trap is entering the second concentration as the higher of the two. The equation describes decay, so C₂ must be smaller than C₁.
Assumptions & limitations
- First-order elimination only. Phenytoin at therapeutic concentrations follows saturable kinetics, where a small dose increase produces a disproportionate concentration rise.
- Assumes both samples are drawn in the terminal elimination phase. A level drawn during distribution gives a falsely rapid apparent elimination.
- Assumes no further doses are given during the interval. Any dose administered invalidates the prediction.
- Assumes clearance is stable. In evolving renal impairment or during dialysis it is not.
References
- Rybak MJ, et al. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin for serious MRSA infections: a revised consensus guideline of ASHP, IDSA, PIDS, and SIDP. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020;77(11):835-864.
- Bauer LA. Applied Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill.
- Winter ME. Basic Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 5th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.