Arterial blood gas interpreter
Determine the primary acid–base disorder from pH, pCO₂, and bicarbonate, with a step-by-step account of how the conclusion was reached.
What is this for?
Acid–base interpretation follows a fixed three-step sequence: establish the direction of the pH, classify the respiratory and metabolic values independently, then identify which of the two matches the pH. Whichever matches is the primary disorder; the other, if it has moved in the opposite direction, is compensating.
How to use it
- Enter the pH, pCO₂, and bicarbonate from the arterial blood gas report.
- Optionally add oxygen saturation, and sodium and chloride if you want the anion gap calculated at the same time.
- Work through the three steps in the worked solution — they mirror the sequence you would use manually.
Worked example
A patient with a COPD exacerbation has pH 7.28, pCO₂ 55 mmHg, HCO₃ 25 mEq/L. Interpret the blood gas.
Answer: pH 7.28 is acidosis. pCO₂ 55 is above 45, so respiratory acidosis. HCO₃ 25 is normal. The respiratory value matches the pH direction, so this is an uncompensated respiratory acidosis.
Clinical pearls & pitfalls
- The pCO₂ relationship is inverted relative to intuition: a high pCO₂ produces acidosis, because carbon dioxide forms carbonic acid. Bicarbonate behaves in the expected direction.
- Compensation always moves the pH back toward normal, never past it. If the pH has overshot, there is a second primary disorder rather than compensation.
- Compensation is never complete. A pH that has returned fully to 7.40 in the presence of markedly abnormal pCO₂ and HCO₃ indicates a mixed disorder.
- Winter's formula tells you whether respiratory compensation for a metabolic acidosis is adequate. A pCO₂ higher than predicted means the patient is also failing to ventilate — often a sign of impending respiratory failure.
- Always calculate the anion gap in a metabolic acidosis. Gap and non-gap acidoses have entirely different differential diagnoses.
Assumptions & limitations
- Uses the simple three-step directional method. It does not compute the full set of expected-compensation formulae for every disorder, nor the delta-delta ratio for identifying a second metabolic process alongside a gap acidosis.
- Reference ranges vary by laboratory and by altitude. Those used here are the conventional sea-level values.
- Assumes an arterial sample. Venous gases have a systematically higher pCO₂ and lower pH, and cannot be interpreted against these ranges.
- Interpretation of the numbers is not a diagnosis. The clinical context determines the cause and the management.
References
- Berend K, de Vries AP, Gans RO. Physiological approach to assessment of acid–base disturbances. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(15):1434-1445.
- Albert MS, Dell RB, Winters RW. Quantitative displacement of acid–base equilibrium in metabolic acidosis. Ann Intern Med. 1967;66(2):312-322. (Winter's formula.)
- Seifter JL. Integration of acid–base and electrolyte disorders. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(19):1821-1831.